PROJECT INTELLIGENCE
HEI Heima
Chain abstraction / identity infrastructure
Engine
v0.21.3
v0.21.3
PARTIAL PREVIEW v0.21.3 adds coverage-regime/component diagnostics on top of leak-safe forward shadow validation and historical MOS replay without changing the v0.8 scoring formulas. The large numbers below are averages of the currently scoreable weight only — they are explicitly NOT final scores and are not persisted as production snapshots.
AQS59.22
average of scored weight — NOT FINALcoverage 73%contribution 43.2302evidence conf. 77.47
MOS52.53
average of scored weight — NOT FINALcoverage 75%contribution 39.3946evidence conf. 90
RISK ↑51.52
average of scored weight — NOT FINALcoverage 73.25%contribution 37.7386evidence conf. 75.55
NO RENORMALIZATION Known contribution remains measured against the full 100-point score. Production gates require at least 70% score-specific coverage plus conflict/freshness checks.
PRODUCTION GATES
Why HEI is still not production-ready
AQS coverage73%need ≥70%
MOS coverage75%need ≥70%
Risk coverage73.25%need ≥70%
Open conflicts2supply reconciliation remains
Derivatives status: access_restricted_http_451. HTTP 451 is treated as access restriction, never as proof that a perpetual contract does not exist.
PRODUCTION RELEASE AUDIT v0.21.3
Coverage can pass while production remains blocked
Coverage gatesPASSAQS/MOS/Risk ≥70%
Conflict gateNO2 open conflicts
Historical validationNOforward OOS: 60 snapshots
CalibrationNOshadow calibration not mature
v0.21.3 deliberately refuses to write production snapshots even if all three coverage thresholds pass. Evidence coverage is necessary, not sufficient.
AQS PREVIEW
Scored components
Tokenomics70% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg83.43
production—
Development & Execution80% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg39.63
production—
Adoption & Traction65% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg49.08
production—
Liquidity & Market Access80% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg54.16
production—
Security & Resilience80% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg29.38
production—
Product & Utility75% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg71.67
production—
Governance & Decentralization90% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg60.53
production—
Competitive Position50% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg68
production—
MOS PREVIEW
Scored components
1D Trend100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg78.69
production—
4H / 1H Structure100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg42.64
production—
Volume & Participation100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg37.09
production—
Relative Strength100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg22.94
production—
1M / 1W Structure100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg69.85
production—
Valuation / Range Positioning50% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg57.15
production—
RISK PREVIEW
Scored components
Liquidity Risk100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg46.75
production—
Smart-contract / Security Risk85% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg77.94
production—
Volatility & Market-structure Risk100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg27.88
production—
Unlock & Inflation Risk100% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg33.09
production—
Holder / Control Concentration50% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg50.48
production—
Protocol & Infrastructure Dependency80% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg66.88
production—
Governance & Key-person Risk50% of this component currently scoreable
known-slice avg78
production—
VALIDATION LAB v0.21.3
Validation diagnostics are active
Forward snapshots60never backdated
MOS replay points46closed candles only
Historical validationCOLLECTINGfull model
CalibrationCOLLECTINGmulti-asset required
LIVE DATA PIPELINE v0.21.3
Automatic evidence refresh
marketevery 15m
live / available55s agotechnicalevery 1h
live / available2050s agoliquidityevery 1h
live / available2044s agofuturesevery 6h
live / access_restricted15003s agogithubevery 24h
live / available15020s agochainevery 5m
live / available146s agofundamentalsevery 24h
live / available15008s agovalidationevery 24h
live / available14946s agomos_replayevery 24h
live / available14946s agoSpot provenance: data-api.binance.vision. Futures separates runner health from data availability. Deployment bootstrap: unknown.
live rows 121history rows 28640pipeline runs 14325DB 271.5 MB
Evidence Engine
Evidence health
Immutable evidence287
Live metrics121
Time-series points28640
Freshness / source81/96
Recurring collectors now update one current row per metric. Only selected raw market/liquidity/development metrics enter retained time-series history.
CONFLICT ENGINE
Open evidence conflicts
tokenomics.cross_chain_supply_reconciliationNative Heima, Ethereum and BNB representations are bridge-linked and cannot be naively summed. A canonical cross-chain issuance reconciliation is still required.
opentokenomics.total_supply_after_burnKeep open: aggregator max/total-supply semantics remain inconsistent with chain-specific issuance/bridge representations. Do not assume 100M displayed max supply equals currently issued supply.
openKNOWN LIMITATIONS
What v0.21.3 deliberately does not validate yet
- 1M/1W remains score-enabled with a limited-history HTF engine; monthly history is still short and uses EMA6/EMA12 rather than EMA20/50/200.
- Derivatives is not score-enabled when Binance Futures is access-restricted from the server; HTTP 451 means UNKNOWN, not unavailable.
- Global holder concentration, exact current on-chain vesting balances, independent protocol audit coverage, regulatory/legal risk, catalysts and independent product-adoption growth remain materially incomplete.
- All thresholds in v0.8 are provisional and must be validated across the multi-asset basket before production use.
LEGACY DEMO
Old seed values
AQS78
MOS58
RISK48
CONF45
DEMO snapshot only — not an investment recommendation and not yet produced by the final CIF methodology.